Open APIs Saturday, 16 September 2006, 10:00, Columbia Club
Today the great saga of Open Source is accompanied by a couple of
narratives like "Web 2.0" and the "long tail economy." A short
definition of Web 2.0 is that all applications are software services
independent of a certain desktop. And the short path for the long tail
is that most of this economy resides in niche applications.
A lot of software services are not "open." Amazon might be build on
the LAMP-stack, but is certainly no open source, even if you have
access to their source code. Google is not open, it builds on a
culture of secrecy. Yet Amazon and Google provide us with hooks to
their services. Authors can blog their books within the sphere of
Amazon, people can do mashups with Google maps.
The same applies to Web 2.0-applications like Flickr which are running
in some Internet cloud. You have the freedom to store your photo, but
if you want to do something more, you have to pay for the Flickr API,
which is not free.
The same applies to the idea of long tail economy. Within Web 2.0,
developers are coding stuff for some tiny minority which may be useful
in the long run. If their work depends on a mesh of different
technologies and applications, they must stay away from the licensing
and API traps.
The Open API panel will discuss the implications of software
services and Open APIs.
First, Harald Alvestrand will give an overview of the IETF discussion
and standardization process. After all, these are the forces that gave
birth to an open internet as the foundation layer of Web 2.0.
Then Stefan Richter of freenigma will give some insights. Freenigma is
a new privacy approach for Web 2.0, with an open API for everybody who
wants to have encryption in his service. But there is more that just
the question of Open APIs and how they are used by developers. As a
mashup, the AJAX-based Freenigma analyses the HTML-presentation and
the structuere of sites like Googlemail, Hotmail or Yahoo Mail. What
about the Copyrights and the 'terms of service'? Are they violated
with this approach?